The Existence of Party Court in Completing the Internal Disputes of Political Parties in Indonesia (A Case Study of Persatuan Pembangunan Party)

S Suparto, A Admiral

Abstract


Abstract

According to Law Number 2 of 2011, “Any internal conflict inherent a political party, is resolved by that party’s internal organ known as the Internal Dispute Settlement Committee. But unfortunately, not all internal conflicts were ironed out, just as what happened to Persatuan Pembangunan Party. Based on the results of the current study, several factors could be identified to influence the resolution of internal political party disputes, including 1). the inability of the disputed internal party to pay heed to the decision of the Party Court. 2). the government violation of the decision made by the Party Court with biased interference. 3). There is doubtful neutrality considering the membership of the Party Court who comes from internal political parties. 4). Not considering the Party Court's decision while adjudicating disputes over the management of political parties.

Keywords: Party Court, Decision, Final.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Budiardjo, M. (2008). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik, Jakarta: Gramedia.

Chaidir, E. & Suparto. (2017). Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Tentang Pemilu Serentak Terhadap Pencalonan Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Pada Pemilu Tahun 2019. UIR Law Review, 1 (1). 1-12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25299/url.2017.1.01.561.

Firdaus & Kurniawan, N. (2017). Kekuatan Putusan Mahkamah Partai Ditinjau dari Sistem Kekuasaan Kehakiman Menurut UUD 1945. Jurnal Konstitusi. 14 (3). 664 - 671 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1439.

Leonardo, et.al. (2016). Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Internal Partai Persatuan Pembangunan (PPP). Jurnal Legalitas. 10 (1). 67-77 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31479/ jphl.v9i2.98.

Noor, F. (2017). Fenomena Post Demokrasi Party di Indonesia. Jurnal Politik. 14 (2). 109–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v14i2.724.

Permana, T. I. (2016). Model Penyelesaian Perselisihan Partai Politik Secara Internal Maupun Eksternal. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan. 5 (1). 35–52 DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.25216/JHP.5.1.2016.35-52.

Purba, C. S. (2017). Eksistensi Mahkamah Partai Persatuan Pembangunan”. Jurnal Media Bhakti. 1 (1). 16–32 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32501/jhmb.v1i1.4.

Budiarti, A. et.al. (2017). Faksi dan Konflik Internal Partai Partai Politik di Indonesia Era Reformasi. Jurnal Politik. 14 (2). 265–279 DOI:https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v14i2.726.

Rachman, M. A. (2016). “Penyelesaian Perselisihan Internal Partai Politik. Jurnal Yuridika, Vol.31, No. 2, 2016. 189 – 219 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v31i2.4828.

Suparto. (2017). Pengujian UU No.27 Tahun 2009 dan UU No. 17 Tahun 2014 Sebagai Upaya DPD Untuk Mengembalikan Kewenangan Konstitusionalnya. UIR Law Review, Vol.1, No.1, 2017. 13 – 24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25299/ulr.2017.1.01.150.

Surbakti, R. (1994). Memahami Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: Gramedia Widia Sarana Indonesia.

Susanto, M. (2017). Memperkuat Pelembagaan Mahkamah Partai Politik: Upaya Mencegah Dualisme Partai Politik. Jurnal Etika dan Pemilu. 3 (1). 31 – 50.

Suwito, Dwi D.P. (2017). Aspek Hukum Perselisihan Internal Partai Politik. Jakarta: Adhi Sarana Nusantara.

Zakaria, A. (2016). Pembatasan Partai Politik Peserta Pemilihan Umum Dalam Perspektif Demokrasi. Jurnal Idea Hukum, 2 (1). 1–11 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/ 1.%25j.2016.2.1.24




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2019.19.1.2497

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.





JURNAL DINAMIKA HUKUMIndexed by :

 


 
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum
Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal SoedirmanCopyright of Jurnal Dinamika Hukum
Yustisia I Building, Room Number 111ISSN 2407-6562 (Online) ISSN 1410-0797 (Print)
Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia, 53122JDH is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License