IMPLIKASI TINDAK PIDANADI LUAR KUHP DALAM HUKUM ACARA PIDANA (Studi Kasus Taraf Sinkronisasi)

Sulistyanta Sulistyanta

Abstract


Settings outside the Criminal Code offense of criminal procedural law contained (special) on the other hand there is the Criminal Procedure Code (general). Criminal law plays an important role in an integrated criminal justice system. Aspects of the substance in the criminal justice system should be aligned, harmonious and synchronous (vertical or horizontal), do not overlap (overlapping). This study contradicts the implications of the regulation of offenses outside the Penal Code raises a variety of criminal law and a matter of consistency in its application. The approach used is normative-legal and case studies. Secondary data to primary data. Data were collected by the research literature. Data were analyzed qualitatively descriptive. Research purposes to detect the level of synchronization rules. The results: there are many circulars issued by sub justice system, police, prosecutors, and judicial. In some ways inconsistent implementation such, the case KAI vs. PERADI in Kupang and Kupang District Court pre-trial ruling.

Key words  : special crimes, the synchronization of criminal procedure and the criminal justice system.


Full Text:


PDF View


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2013.13.2.202

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.





JURNAL DINAMIKA HUKUM Indexed by :
Crossref logo

 
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum
Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal SoedirmanCopyright of Jurnal Dinamika Hukum
Yustisia IV Building, Law Journal CenterISSN 2407-6562 (Online) ISSN 1410-0797 (Print)
Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia, 53122JDH is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License