PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATION OF RELIGIOUS COURT COMPETENCE TOWARDS ENCUMBRANCE RIGHT EXECUTION

Abd. Shomad, Rahadi Wasi Bintoro

Abstract


Religious court as forefront in economic sharia dispute resolution in litigation has not ideal place to perform their duty since there are still regulation conflicts such as implementation of encumbrance right execution which still becomes a domain in district court. As explained, this article discusses phi-losophical foundation of Religious Court competence to resolve economic sharia issues. In regard to this, conceptual approach, law approach and historical approach are respectively used. Based on the analysis, basic competence of religious court is Islamic personality principle which carries the use of Islamic law elements (sharia principle) in its legal relationship. From the analysis the implication is drawn that as long as a dispute belongs to economic sharia, then it is Religious Court which is com-petent to handle including court decision.

Keywords: law enforcement, economic sharia dispute, absolute competence, court decision implementation


Full Text:

PDF

References


Mehmet Asutay. “Conceptualisation Of The Second Best Solution In Overcoming The Social Failure Of Islamic Banking And Finance: Examining The Overpowering Of Homoislamicus By Homoeconomicus”. IIUM Journal of Economics and Managemen. Vol. 15. No. 2. 2007. Pp. 167-195;

M. Raquibuz Zaman and Hormoz Movassaghi. Islamic Banking A Performance Analysis “. The Journal of Global Business . Vol. 12. No. 22. Spring 2001. Pp. 31-38;

Abd. Shomad. “Penerapan prinsip Bagi hasil pada Bank Syariah di jawa Timur”. Masalah-masalah Hukum. Jilid 39 No. 2. 2010. Pp. 96-105. DOI: 10.14710/mmh.39.2.2010.96-105;

John R Presley and John G Sessions. “Islamic Economics: The Emergence of a New Paradm”. The Economic Journal. Vol. 104. May 1994. Pp. 584-596.

Ahmad. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Pengadilan Agama”. Jurnal Ius. Vol. 2 No. 6. Desember 2014. h. 476-488.

Liky Faisal. “Politik Ekonomi Islam Dalam Pembangunan Ekonomi Nasional Di Indonesia”. Jurnal Asas. Vol 5 No. 2. 2013. Pp. 1-11;

Nevi Hasnita. “Politik Hukum Ekonomi Syari’ah Di Indonesia”. Legitimasi. Vol.1 No. 2. Januari-Juni 2012. Pp. 108-124;

Ari Kurniawan dan Abd. Shomad. “The Development of Murabaha in Indonesia Islamic Banks”. Rechtsidee. Vol. 3 No. 1. 2006. Pp. 1-16. DOI: 10.21070/jihr.v3i1.153

Munawar Iqbal And Philip Molyneux. “Thirty Years Of Islamic Banking:History. Performance And Prospects”. J.Kau: Islamic Econ.. Vol. 19. No. 1. 2006. Pp. 37-39;

M. Kabir Hassan and Abdel-Hameed M. Bashir. 2003. “Determinants of Islamic Banking Profitability”. Papers. 10th ERF Annual Conference. Morocco. Tersedia di: http://nzibo.com/IB2/Determinants. pdf. diakses pada tanggal 11 Desember 2014;

Mardani. “Kedudukan Hukum Islam dalam Sistem hukum Nasional”. Jurnal Hukum. Vol. 16 No. 2. April 2009. h. 267-287. DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol16.iss2.art7

Ali Mansyur. “Aspek Hukum Perbankan Syariah dan Implementasinya di Indonesia”. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum. Vol. 11 Edisi khusus. 2011. h. 67-75. DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2011.11.Edsus.263

Tim Lindsey. “Between Piety and Prudence: State Syariah and the Regulation of Islamic Banking in Indonesia” . Sydney Law Review. Vol. 34 No. 107. 2012. Pp. 107-127.

Khopiatuziadah. “Kajian Yuridis Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah”. Jurnal Legislasi. Vol. 10 No. 3. September 2013. Pp. 279-290.

Ramlan Yusuf Rangkuti. “Sistem Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Islam: Instrumen Penting bagi Konsep Ekonomi Islam Mendatang”. Asy-Syir’ah-Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum. Vol. 45 No. 2. Juli-Desember 2011. h. 1431-1449.

Yahya Harahap. 2001. Kedudukan. Kewenangan dan Acara Peradilan Agama. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Etika Rahmawati. “Telaah terhadap Asas Personalitas Keislaman Dikaitkan dengan Teori Receptio in Complexu”. Gloria Yuris. Vol 1 No. 2. 2013 diakses pada web http://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jmfh.

Jaenal Aripin. 2008. Peradilan Agama dalam Bingkai Reformasi Hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana.

Rachmadi Usman. 2011. Hukum Kebendaan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Yahya harahap. 1989. Ruang Lingkup Eksekusi Bidang Perdata. Jakarta: Gramedia;

Subekti. 1989. Hukum Acara Perdata. Bandung: Bina Cipta;

M. Daud Ali. “Undang-undang Peradilan Agama”. Panji Masyarakat. Nomor 634. tanggal 1-10 Januari 1990. Jakarta;

Abd. Somad. “Dinamisasi Penormaan hukum islam”. Perspektif. Vol 15 No. 2. 2010. Pp. 99-122

Abd. Shomad. “Tajdid Pada Akad Pembiayaan Murabahah di Bank Syariah”. Masalah-masalah Hukum. Vol. 40 No. 1. 2011. Pp. 1-9. DOI: 10.14710/mmh.40.1.2011.1-9;

Moh Sutomo. Syarifah Marwiyah. dan Nur Mawaddah Warohmah. “Akar Historis Pengadilan Agama Masa Orde Baru”. YUDISIA. Vol. 7. No. 2. Desember 2016 h. 267-284;

Sumadi Matrais. “Kemandirian Peradilan Agama dalam Perspektif Undang-undang Peradilan Agama”. IUSTUM. No. 1 Vol. 15 Januari 2008. h. 121-144. DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol15.iss1.art6

Hamiyuddin. “Sejarah Politik Hukum Terhadap Peradilan Agama Di Indonesia”. Bilancia. Vol. 10 No. 2. Juli - Desember 2016. Pp. 134-152




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2018.18.2.2063

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.





JURNAL DINAMIKA HUKUMIndexed by :

 


 
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum
Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal SoedirmanCopyright of Jurnal Dinamika Hukum
Yustisia I Building, Room Number 111ISSN 2407-6562 (Online) ISSN 1410-0797 (Print)
Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia, 53122JDH is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License