Hospital Dispute Settlement Through the Provincial Hospital Supervisory Board in Indonesian Health Law (A Study in Yogyakarta Province)
Abstract
Hospitals as health service institutions with legal entities are places that are prone to disputes. Article 60 Law no. 44 of 2009 assigned the Provincial Hospital Supervisory Board to receive complaints and make efforts to resolve disputes employing mediation. An analysis of the forms of hospital disputes and their settlement model through the Provincial Hospital Supervisory Board is very important to be done to avoid misinterpretation and provide legal certainty about who is the authorized party to handle them. The research method used was normative juridical and empirical juridical. The results of this study are to obtain an analysis of the forms of complaints that can be submitted to the Provincial Hospital Supervisory Board including disputes over hospitals as health service facilities where medical personnel and health workers provide health services that are detrimental to patients; disputes between the hospital as a health service facility and the patient as the recipient of health services related to the implementation of the obligations of both parties; disputes between the hospital as a legal entity and the hospital workforce related to internal management; the disputes between hospital as a legal entity and the third parties related to non-medical cooperation; the disputes between hospital as a legal entity and the environment. The hospital dispute resolution model implemented by the Provincial Hospital Supervisory Board of Yogyakarta includes the hospital dispute resolution model by the Provincial Hospital Supervisory Board in collaboration with hospitals, the Hospital Supervisory Board, Provincial Health Office, Provincial Legal Representatives (Ombudsman), YLKI, and PERSI.
Keywords: Provincial Hospital Supervisory Board, Disputes Form, Dispute Settlement Model.
Full Text:
PDF View
References
Afandi, Dedi. (2009). Mediasi: Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis. Majalah Kedokteran Indonesia. 59 (5). Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.
Alawiya, Nayla, et.al. (2015). Hospital Supervisory Board Role in Medical Dispute Settlement in Hospital (Analylis toward Mechanism and Normative Obstacles). Jurnal Dinamika Hukum. 15 (3).
Arifin, Dani Amalia. (2016). Kajian Yuridis Tanggung Jawab Perdata Rumah Sakit Akibat Kelalaian Dalam Pelayanan Kesehatan. Jurnal Idea Hukum. 2 (1).
Astuti, Endang Kusuma. (2011). Tanggung Gugat Dokter dan Rumah Sakit Kepada Pasien Pada Kegagalan Pelayanan Medis di Rumah Sakit. Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum. 40 (2).
Bawole, Grace Yurico. (2013). Rumah Sakit sebagai Badan Hukum Bertanggung Jawab atas Tindakan Medis yang Dilakukan Dokternya. Lex Crimen. 2 (5). 137.
Hanifah, Mardalena. (2016). Kajian Yuridis: Mediasi sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata di Pengadilan. Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata ADHAPER. 1(2).
Herkutanto. (1989). Masalah Pelayanan Dokter Kepada Pasien. Ind-Hill-Co. 88.
Kulms, R. (2013). Mediation in the USA: Alternative Dispute Resolution between Legalism and Self-Determination. In K. J. HOPT, F. STEFFEK, Felix (eds.), Mediation: Principles and Regulation in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1245-1328.
Kumaralingam Amirthalingam. (2017). Medical Dispute Resolution, Patient Safety and The Doctor-Patient Relationship. Singapore Medical Journal. 58 (12). 681 – 684.
Lee, D. W. H., Lai, P. B. S. (2015). The Practice of Mediation to Resolve Clinical, Bioethical, and Medical Malpractice Disputes. Hong Kong Medical Journal. 21 (6).
Marlynn Wei, Doctors. (2006). Apologies and the Law: An Analysis and Critique of Apology Laws. Journal Health Law. 3 (9). 107-110.
Mufidi, Faiz dan Sri Pursetyowati. (2009). Penyelesaian Sengketa Medik di Rumah Sakit. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Wacana Paramarta. 8 (1).
Njoto, Haryanto. (2011). Pertanggungjawaban Dokter dan Rumah Sakit Akibat Tindakan Medis Yang Merugikan dalam Perspektif UU No. 44 Tahun 2009 tentang Rumah Sakit. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. 7 (14).
Nuryanto, Arif. (2012). Model Perlindungan Hukum Profesi Dokter. Jurisprudence. 1 (1).
Rahmadi, Takdir. (2011). Mediasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Pendekatan Mufakat. Jakarta: RajawaliPers.
Rahmah, Dian Maris. (2019). Optimalisasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Mediasi di Pengadilan. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum. 4 (1).
Salim, HS. (2010). Perkembangan Teori dalam Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sukarjono, Bambang. (2009). Liabilitas Hukum Pihak Rumah Sakit terhadap Pasien (Studi tentang Perlindungan Konsumen/Pasien dan Tanggung Jawab Pihak Rumah Sakit dalam Transaksi Terapeutik pada Rumah Sakit Islam Siti Aisyah Kota Madiun)”. Sosial. 10 (2).
Talib, Idris. (2013). Bentuk Putusan Penyelesaian Sengketa Berdasarkan Mediasi. Lex et Societatis. 1 (1).
Toshimi, Nakanishi. (2013). New Communication Model in Medical Dispute Resolution in Japan. Yamagata Medical Journal. 31 (1). 1-8.
Wahyudi, Setya. (2011). Tanggung Jawab Rumah Sakit terhadap Kerugian Akibat Kelalaian Tenaga Kesehatan dan Implikasinya. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum. 11 (3).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2023.23.1.2351
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
JURNAL DINAMIKA HUKUM Indexed by :
 |  |  |
 |  |  |
 |  |  |
 |  |  |
 |  |  |
 |  |  |
 |  |  |
 |  |
 | Jurnal Dinamika Hukum |  |
| Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman | Copyright of Jurnal Dinamika Hukum | |
| Yustisia IV Building, Law Journal Center | ISSN 2407-6562 (Online) ISSN 1410-0797 (Print) | |
| Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia, 53122 | JDH is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License | |