General Principles of Good Governance in Administrative Court Decision Regarding Request for Review of Abuse of Authority
Abstract
The administrative court is given the authority to review the request for review of abuse of authority according to the legislation and general principles of good governance as the two touchstones. This review may serve as a testing benchmark to discuss the issue of the request over the abuse of authority as requested by government officials, recalling that abuse of authority has several criteria to proscribe and regulate in the general principles of good governance. The research problems involved the criteria and the bases for determining the type of abuse of authority in the request over the abuse of authority. This research employed a normative method, statutory, and historical approaches. The research results concluded that the Decision 2/P/PW/2017/PTUN.JBI holds the relevance to the current legislation, public interest, and the absence of state losses, while the Decision 09/P/PW/2018/PTUN.Sby only refers to the current legislation in terms of its relevance. Although the general principles of good governance refer to the administrative court as the touchstone, this touchstone is not optimally used in the request for review of abuse of authority.
Keywords: AUPB (general principles of good governance); Administrative Court; request for review of abuse of authority.
Full Text:
PDF View
References
Asmuni. (2017). Konsep Pelaksanaan Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Penundaan Pelaksanaan Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Oleh Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Malang: Setara Press.
Cahyandari, Dewi. (2020). Upaya Pemerintah Daerah dalam Pencegahan dan Penanggulangan Wabah Virus Korona. Cakrawala: Jurnal Litbang Kebijakan. 14(1). 76-81.
Freidman, W. (1971). The State and Rule of Law in a Mixed Economy. London: Steven and Sand.
Gautama, Sudargo. (1983). Pengertian tentang Negara Hukum. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Hadjon, Philipus M. et.al. (2012). Hukum Admnistrasi dan Good Governace. Jakarta. Penerbit: Universitas Trisakti.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. (2009). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Prenada Media Grup.
Putrijanti, Ayu. Leonard, Lapon T. and Utama, Kartika Widya. (2018). Peran PTUN dan AUPB Menuju Tata Kelola Pemerintahan yang Baik (Good Governance). Jurnal Mimbar Hukum. 30(2). 277-290.
Soemantri, Sri. (2014). Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia, Pemikiran dan Pandangan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Stroink, F.A.M. and Steenbeek, J.G. (1985). Inleiding in het staats-en Adminitratief Recht, Alphen aan de Rijn. Samson H.D Tjeenk Willink.
Subur, D. (2014). Bunga Rampai Peradilan Administrasi Kontemporer. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.
Sudarsono. (2013). Sekilas Tentang Wewenang dan Penyalahgunaan Wewenang. Malang: Universitas Wishnuwardhan Press.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2021.21.3.3070
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
JURNAL DINAMIKA HUKUM Indexed by :
 |  |  |
 |  |  |
 |  |  |
 |  |  |
 |  |  |
 |  |  |
 |  |  |
 |  |
 | Jurnal Dinamika Hukum |  |
| Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman | Copyright of Jurnal Dinamika Hukum | |
| Yustisia IV Building, Law Journal Center | ISSN 2407-6562 (Online) ISSN 1410-0797 (Print) | |
| Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia, 53122 | JDH is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License | |