JUDICIAL PROBLEMATIC OF SURVEILLANCE JUDGE IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA

Muhammad Fauzan

Abstract


The presence of the Judicial Commission in the constitutional system of the Republic of Indonesia is mandated by the constitution of 1945, which in the execution of their duties and functions has provoked a variety of opinions, especially related to the supervision of judges who are considered to threaten the independence of the judicial power. Based on the results of discussion it is concluded that the juridical problematic which happens to the supervision of judges in the constitutional system of the Republic of Indonesia covering the  First, unclear formulation of Article 24B of the  Constitution 1945, especially related with the other authority of the Judicial Commission in order to preserve and enforce the honor, dignity, and the behavior of judges. The Second, it is related with the disharmony and inconsistency legislation regulations that controlling the supervision of judges, The Third, it is related to the institutional organization of the Judicial Commission and the Fourth, it is related to the vagueness of the definition of supervision.

 

Keywords: problematic, Surveillance Judge, Indonesia


Full Text:

PDF

References


Asshiddiqie, Jimly. 2006. Perkembangan dan Konsolidasi Lembaga Negara Pasca Reformasi. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI;

Fauzan, Muhammad. “Pasang SurutHubungan Antara Mahkamah Agung dengan Komisi Yudisial Dalam Sistematika Ketatanegaraan republik Indonesia”. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum. Vol. 12 No. 1. January 2012. Purwokerto: Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman;

Gultom, Binsar M. “Hormati Independensi Badan Peradilan”. Varia Peradilan Majlah Hukum Year XXX No. 350. January 2015. Jakarta: IKAHI;

Kelsen, Hans. Pure Theory of Law. 1967. Page 313 in Denny Indrayana. “Negara Hukum Indonesia Pasca Soeharto: Transisi Menuju Demokrasi vs Korupsi. Jurnal Konstitusi”. Vol.1 No. 1. July 2004. Jakarta: Constitutional Court;

Khaliq, Farid Abdul. 2005. Fi Al-Fiqh As-Syiasiy Al-Islami Mabadi Dusturriyyah As-Syura Al-‘Adl Al-Musyawah. Translated by Faturrahman A.Hamid. Fiqih Politik Islam. Jakarta: Amzah.

Annual Report of Supreme Court in 2013. Page 20 and 146

Masrur, Devica Rully. “Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian UU No. 22 Tahun 2004 Tentang Komisi Yudisial Terhadap Pengawasan Perilaku Hakim”. Jurnal Hukum Kebijakan Publik RES REPUBLICA. Vol. 1 No. 1. September 2007. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret;

Mohammad Fajrul Falaakh. MA-MK-KY Kekaburan Konstitusi. http://www.unisosdem.org/article_detail.php?aid=6563&coid=3&caid=21&gid=3. Downloaded on December 3rd 2011.

Nurhadi. Bunga Rampai :m Independesi Peradilan dan Imunitas Yudisial Hakim Yang Terancam. Varia Peradilan Majalah Hukum. Year XXVII No. 331 June 2013. Jakarta: IKAHI. 2013;

Suseno, Franz Magnis. 1993. Etika Politik: Prinsip Moral Dasar Kenegaraan Modern. Jakarta: Gramedia;

Yusran. “Pengawasan Hakin dan Akuntabilitas Peradilan”. Varia Peradilan. Year XXX No. 354. May 2015;




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2016.16.2.615

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.





JURNAL DINAMIKA HUKUMIndexed by :

 


 
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum
Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal SoedirmanCopyright of Jurnal Dinamika Hukum
Yustisia I Building, Room Number 111ISSN 2407-6562 (Online) ISSN 1410-0797 (Print)
Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia, 53122JDH is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License