COUNTERMEASURES BY THIRD PARTY IN INTERNATIONAL LAW
Abstract
The weak law enforcement in international law often causes countermeasure to appear. Countermeasure is not only done by injured state but also by non-injured states. In this research, the two research questions are formulated: countermeasure regulations in international law and countermeasures legality by third party. This research applied normative legal research method conducted through library research. This research used legislation, historical and conceptual approach. Then, the data were analyzed qualitatively and the results of the study were analytical descriptively presented. The result of this research shows that countermeasure by injured state has been accepted under certain conditions. However, Countermeasure done by the third party remains controversial which means that the obscurity requires further regulation to avoid the abusive action.
Keywords: Countermeasure, Injured State, Third PartyKeywords
Full Text:
PDF View
References
Dawidowicz, Martin. “Third-party countermeasures: A progressive development of international law”. Question of Onternational Law. Zoom in 29. 2016. Available on website: http://www.qil-qdi.org/third-party-countermeasures-progressive-development-international-law/;
De la Corte, Luis and Andrea Giménez-Salinas. “Suicide Terrorism as a Tool of Insurgency Campaigns: Functions. Risk Factors. and Countermeasures”. Perspective on Terrorism. Vol. III Issue 1. April 2009. Available on website: http://www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/articles/issues/PTv3i1.pdf;
Hakimi, Monica. “Unfriendly Unilateralism”. Harvard International Law Journal. Vol. 55 Issue. 1. 2014. Massachussetts: Harvard Law School;
Jung Ni, Kuei. “Third State Countermeasure for Enforcing International Common Environmental Interest: The Implication and Inspiration of ILC’s Articles on State responsibility”. Chinese (Taiwan) Yearbook. Vol. 22 (1-47). 2004. Available on website: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1930951;
Katselli, Elena. 2005. “Countermeasures by Non-Injured States in the Law on State Responsibility”. Paper. European Society of International Law. Available on website: http://www.esil-sedi.eu/sites/default/files/Katselli_0.PDF;
Klabbers, John. International Law. Cambridge Univeristy Press. 2013;
Linos-Alexander Sicilianos. “The Classification of Obligations and the Multilateral Diension of the Relations of International responsibility”.
Europan Journal of International Law. Vol. 13 Issue. 5. 2002. Oxford: Oxford University;
Ozbilici, Burhan. 20 December 2016. Duta Besar Rusia untuk Turki Tewas Ditembak Mati di Ankara. Available on website: http://www.bbc.com/indonesia/dunia-38373034. accessed on 24 December 2016;
Peacebuilding Commission. “Security Council Subsidiary Bodies: An Overiew”. Available on website: http://www.un.org/sc/committees. accessed on 20 October 2016;
Pierre-Marie Du. “Back to the Future of a Multilateral Dimension of the law of State responsibility for the Breaches of Obligations Owed to the International Community as a Whole”. Europan Journal of International Law. Vol. 23 No. 4. 2012. Oxford: Oxford University. page. 1061
Ruys, Tom. Sanctions. “Retorsions and Countermeasures: Concepts and International Legal Framework”. Forthcoming in Larissa van den Herik (ed.). Research Handbook on UN Sanctions and International Law.
Edward Elgar Publishing. Available on website:
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2760853;
Sassoli, Marco. “State Responsibility for Violation of International
Humanitarian Law”. IRRC. Vol. 84 No. 846. June 2002. International
Committee of The Red Cross. Available on website: https://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/401_434_sassoli.pdf;
T. Andrew. 2008. Guzman. How international law works: a rational choice theory. Oxford University Press. Inc.;
van den Herik, L.J.. “Peripheral Hegemony in the Quest to ensure Security Council Accountability for its individualized UN sanctions regimes:’. Journal Conflict Security Law. Vol. 19 Issue. 3. 2014. Oxford: Oxford Univesity Press;
Weil, Prosper. “Towards Relative Normativity in International Law”. American Journal of International Law. Vol. 77 Issue. 3 July 1983. American Society of International Law. Available on website: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2201073;
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2017.17.2.759
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
JURNAL DINAMIKA HUKUM Indexed by :
 |  |  |
 |  |  |
 |  |  |
 |  |  |
 |  |  |
 |  |  |
 |  |  |
 |  |
 | Jurnal Dinamika Hukum |  |
| Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman | Copyright of Jurnal Dinamika Hukum | |
| Yustisia IV Building, Law Journal Center | ISSN 2407-6562 (Online) ISSN 1410-0797 (Print) | |
| Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia, 53122 | JDH is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License | |