FORSAKING EQUALITY: EXAMINE INDONESIA’S STATE RESPONSIBILITY ON POLYGAMY TO THE MARRIAGE RIGHTS IN CEDAW

N Nurhidayatuloh, F Febrian, Achmad Romsan, Annalisa Yahanan, Martinus Sardi, Fatimatuz Zuhro

Abstract


Human rights violation (HRV) occurs when a state including its organs commits HRV to individual within its jurisdiction. International Law has formulated a wide range of human rights law, especially the CEDAW which has been ratified through Law No. 7 of 1984. However, the law has not been applied properly. This article aims to examine HRV committed by a state which caused inability or unwilling to amend polygamy Law. Based on normative research, analysis to Article 2(f) of the Convention applies a viewpoint equality and state responsibility theories. Through this method, international conventions will be opposed to national provisions, Polygamy regulation. It is found that Indonesia through Polygamy regulation performs discrimination against woman’s rights. It can be stated that Marriage Law treats men and women unequal. It concludes that, as a state, Indonesia should responsible for HRV because the main problem of inequality is discrimination rooted from Polygamy regulation.

Keywords: equality, human rights violation, non-discrimination, polygamy, state responsibility


Full Text:

PDF

References


Adolf, Huala. 2002. Aspek-Aspek Negara Dalam Hukum Internasional. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada

Alimuddin, ‘Undang-Undang Perkawinan, Antara Sejarah Dan Agenda’, Harian Kami. http://badilag.net/data/ARTIKEL/UU PERKAWINAN ANTARA SEJARAH DAN AGENDA.pdf. Accessed December 2nd, 2014.

Ansor, Muhammad. “Berbagi Suami Atas Nama Tuhan: Pengalaman Keseharian Perempuan Dipoligami Di Langsa.” Ijtihad, Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan. Vol.14 No. 1. June 2014. Pp. 41-63. DOI: 10.18326/ijtihad.v14i1.41-63

Arief, Hanafi. “Legal Protection Against Women Victims by The Indonesian Domestic Violence Act 23, 2004.” Sriwijaya Law Review. Vol. 1 No. 1. January 2017. Pp. 88-97. DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol1.Iss1.12.pp110-121

Asplund, Knut D. et al., ed. 2008. Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia. Yogyakarta: PUSHAM UII;

Bassiouni, M Cherif. "International Recognition of Victims’ Rights." Human Rights Law Review. Vol. 6. No. 2. January 2006. Pp. 203-279. DOI: 10.1093/hrlr/ngl009;

Crawford, James. 2008. Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law. Seventh Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press;

Facio, Alda & Martha I. Morgan. “Equity or Equality for Womern? Understanding CEDAW’s Equality Principles.” Alabama Law Review. Vol. 60 No. 5. September 2009;

Hannum, Hurst. “Reinvigorating Human Rights for the Twenty-First Century.” Human Rights Law Review. Vol. 16. No. 3 September 2016. Pp. 1-43. DOI: 10.1093/hrlr/ngw015

Hidayat, Eko. “Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Negara Hukum Indonesia.” JURNAL ASAS. Vol. 8 No. 2. July 2016. Pp. 80-87;

Liunima, Joni Efraim. "Progresive Law Enforcement Towards Human Rights Violation In Kupang City." Jurnal Dinamika Hukum. Vol. 16 No. 1. January 2016. Pp. 79-84. DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2016.16.1.462;

Mcgoldrick, Dominic. “The Development and Status of Sexual Orientation Discrimination under International Human Rights Law.” Human Rights Law Review. Vol. 16 No. 4. December 2016. Pp 613-668. DOI: 10.1093/hrlr/ngw030;

Musarrofa, Ita. “Poligami: Antara Legalitas Formal Dan Legalitas Budaya (Studi Kasus Praktik Poligami Kyai Pesantren Di Probolinggo Jawa Timur.” Al-Mawarid. Vol. 14 No. 1. 2005. Pp. 198-211;

Mulia, Siti Musdah. 2004. Islam Menggugat Poligami. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama;

Mustaqim, Abdul. “Pemikiran Fikih Kontemporer Muhamad Syahrur Tentang Poligami Dan Jilbab.” Al-Manahij. Vol. 5 No. 1. January 2011. Pp. 67-80. DOI: 10.24090/mnh.v5i1.2011.pp67-80;

Mustofa, Ahmad and Khoirul Fata. "Menyoal Kontekstualisasi Hukum Islam Tentang Poligami." Jurnal Al-Ulum, Vol. 13 No. 2. December 2013. Pp. 415-434;

Nurhidayatuloh. "Dilema Pengujian Undang-Undang Ratifikasi Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Konteks Ketetanegaraan RI." Jurnal Konstitusi. Vol. 9. No. 1 March 2012. Pp. 113-134;

———. 2008. Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Kasus Poligami (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Agama DIY Tentang Poligami Tahun 2006). Yogyakarta: Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University;

Philip, Christanugra. “Tanggung Jawab Negara Terhadap Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Menurut Hukum Internasional.” Lex Administratum. Vol. 4. No. 2. February 2016. Pp. 33-39;

Sanyoto, “Implementasi Poligami Antinomi Antara Individual Rights Dan Social Rights,” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum. Vol. 8 No. 1 January. 2008. Pp. 51-55. DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2008.8.1.31;

Shaw, Malcolm N. 2008. International Law, 6th edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sutandi, Wilda Triana. "Gambaran Simtom Depresi Pada Istri Yang Dipoligami." Neotic Psychology. Vol. 1 No. 2. January 2011. Pp. 102-109;

Verma, Justice J.S. “Human Rights Redefined: The New Universe of Human Rights.” Journal of the NHRC. Vol. 1 2002. Pp. 1-17;

Warits, Abd. and Abd. Wahed. "Praktik Poligami Di Bawah Tangan Di Desa Laden Kabupaten Pamekasan." AL-Ahkam. Vol. 9 No. 2. December 2014. Pp. 223-259.

Wartini, Atik. “Poligami: Dari Fiqh Hingga Perundang-Undangan.” Hunafa: Jurnal Studia Islamika. Vol. 10 No. 2 December 2013. Pp. 237-268. DOI: 10.24239/jsi.v10i2.29.237-268;

Wulandari, Cahya and Indung Wijayanto. "Gender-Based Restorative Justice for Victims of Violence Against Women." Jurnal Dinamika Hukum. Vol. 15 No. 1. January 2015. Pp. 82-88. DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2015.15.1.368.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2018.18.2.810

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.





JURNAL DINAMIKA HUKUMIndexed by :

 


 
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum
Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal SoedirmanCopyright of Jurnal Dinamika Hukum
Yustisia I Building, Room Number 111ISSN 2407-6562 (Online) ISSN 1410-0797 (Print)
Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia, 53122JDH is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License