MODEL OF JUDGES SUPERVISION FOR INDONESIA INDEPENDENT JUDICIAL POWER IMPLEMENTATION

Muhammad Fauzan, Riris Ardhanariswari, Ahmad Komari

Abstract


Judges supervision in Indonesia’s constitutional system in the future will only be performed by Judicial Commission. Judicial Commission involves Judicial Commission, Provincial Judicial Commission and District/City Judicial Commission based on each authority. The research discusses model of judges supervision to implement an independent judicial power for the future Indonesia. This research is a normative juridical research with statute approach and conceptual approach. The results show Local Judicial Commission has duties and authorities to; First, monitor and surpervise Judges’ behavior. Second, receive report from the people related to the violence of Ethic Code and/or Judges Code of Conduct. Third, verify, clarrify, ad investigate report related to presumption of violation of Ethic Code and/or Judges Code of Conduct covertly. Fourth, take legal action and/or other actions to individual, group or legal entity that degrade the honor and dignity of Judges.

Keywords: Judicial Commission, judicial power, supervision

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adonara, Firman Floranta. “Prinsip Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Memutus Perkara Sebagai Amanat Konstitusi”. Jurnal Konstitusi. Vol. 12 No. 2 June 2015. Jakarta: Constitutional Court;

Afandi, Verdinandus Kiki. dkk. “Pengawasan Komisi Yudisial Terhadap Kehormatan Keluhuran Dan Martabat Perilaku Hakim Berdasarkan Uud Negara Republik Indonesia 1945”. Jurnal Kertha Semaya. Vol. 1 No. 1 January 2015. Denpasar: Law Faculty of Universitas Udayana;

Fauzan, Muhammad. “Eksistensi Komisi Yudisial Dalam Struktur Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia dan yang Seharusnya diatur dalam Peraturan-perundang”. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum. Vol. 8 No. 1 January 2008 Edition. Purwokerto: Law Faculty of Universitas Jenderal Soedirman;

Fauzan, Muhammad. “Pasang Surut Hubungan Antara Mahkamah Agung Dengan Komisi Yudisial Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia”. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum. Vol 12 No. 1. Purwokerto: Law Faculty of Universitas Jenderal Soedirman;

Gultom, Bismar M. “Hormati Independensi Badan Peradilan”. Varia Peradilan No. 350 January 2015. Jakarta: Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia;

Ketua Mahkamah Agung RI. “Pedoman Perilaku Hakim”. Varia Peradilan. No. 252 October 2006. Jakarta: Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia;

Machmudin, Dudu Duswara. “Peranan Keyakinan Hakim dalam Memutus suatu Perkara di Pengadilan”. Varia Peradilan. No. 252. October 2006. Jakarta: Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia;

Manan, Bagir. 1995. Kekuasaan Kehakiman Republik Indonesia. Bandung: LPPM of Universitas Islam Bandung;

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. 2005. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana;

Sastrohardjono, Widiyatno. “Profesionalisme Dan SDM Hakim Sebagai Salah Satu Prasyarat Peradilan Yang Agung (Court Excelent)”. Varia Peradilan. No. 331. June 2013. Jakarta: Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia;




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2017.17.1.831

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.





JURNAL DINAMIKA HUKUMIndexed by :

 


 
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum
Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal SoedirmanCopyright of Jurnal Dinamika Hukum
Yustisia I Building, Room Number 111ISSN 2407-6562 (Online) ISSN 1410-0797 (Print)
Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia, 53122JDH is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License