JUDGE VERDICTS ON SUBSIDIARY FINE PENALTY OF CORRUPTION CRIMES (A Case Study on High Prosecutor General Office of NTT)

Sulistyanta Sulistyanta, Henderina Malo

Abstract


Additional fine penalty in corruption constitutes specific regulation. This aims to restore the state financial loss and to give deterrent effect. Yet, the judge's verdict raises problems: Why do the judge's verdicts related to subsidiary fine penality by imprisonment penalty tend to vary and inconsistent in length of the imprisonment. The purpose of the study is to identify and analyze the judge's consideration in determining various and inconsistent subsidiary fine penalty by imprisonment. The research applied normative juridical method by relying on primary and secondary legal materials. The results show that: 1) judges do not specifically regulate fine penalty or subsidiary in terms of imprisonment penalty. The large amount of fine penalty does not equal to the relatively short imprisonment which does not result in a deterrent effect. 2) There is no limit to the length of imprisonment for a short sentence. Thus, it is suggested that proportional regulation is required between fine penalty and imprisonment penalty subsidiary for restoring state financial loss.

Keywords: fine penalty, imprisonment penalty subsdiary, judge's verdict


Full Text:


PDF View

References


Ali, Mahrus. “Sistem Peradilan Pidana Progresif: Alternatif dalam Penegakan Hukum”. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum. No. 2 Vol. 14. April 2007. Pp. 210-229. DOI: 10.20885/ iustum.vol14.iss2.art2;

Arief, Barda Nawawi. 2008. Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group;

Arief, Barda Nawawi. “Perlindungan Korban Kejahatan dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana”. Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum. No. 5. 1997;

Christianto, Hwian. “Penafsiran Hukum Progresif dalam Perkara Pidana”. Jurnal Mimbar Hukum. Vol. 23 No. 3. October 2011. Pp. 479-500. DOI: 10.22146/jmh.16170;

Krisna Sintia Dewi, Kadek, “Efektifitas Penerapan Ancaman Sanksi Pidana Tambahan Guna Pengembalian Kerugian Negara dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Kasus di Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar)”. Jurnal Magister Hukum. Vol.3 No. 3 2014. Pp. 357- 370. DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2014.v03.i03. p01;

Munzil, Fontain, Imas Rasidawati Wr, Sukendar. “Kesebandingan Pidana Uang Pengganti dan Pengganti Pidana Uang Pengganti dalam Rangka Melindungi Hak Ekonomi Negara dan Kepastian Hukum”. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum. Vol. 22 No. 1. January 2015. Pp. 25-53. DOI: 10.20885/ius tum.vol22.iss1.art2;

Safii, Imron. “Urgensi Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Mewujudkan Peradilan yang Bersih dan Berwibawa”. Pandecta. Vol. 9 No. 1. January 2014. Pp. 76-91. DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.v9i1.2999;

Sandri, Bobbi dkk. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Hakim dalam Menjatuhkan Hukuman Badan sebagai Pengganti dalam Pembayaran Uang Pengganti dalam Perkara

Pidana”. USU Law Jurnal. Vol. 4 No. 2. March 2016. Pp. 42-55;

Seno Adji, Indriyanto. 2006. Korupsi, Kebijakan Aparatur Negara dan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: CV. Diadit Media;

Syamsudin, M. “Rekonstruksi Pola Pikir Hakim dalam Memutuskan Perkara Korupsi Berbasis Hukum Progresif”. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum. Vol. 11 No. 1. January 2011. Pp. 11-21. DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2011.11.1.11;

Sulistyanta. “Kebijakan Sanksi Pidana dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Suatu Analisis Empirik)”. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. Vol 12. No. 1. March 2004. Pp. 141-158;

Sutyoso, Bambang. “Mencari Format Ideal Keadilan Putusan dalam Peradilan”. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA ISTUM. Vol. 17 No. 2. April 2010. Pp. 217-232. DOI: 10.20885/ iustum.vol17.iss2.art3;

Wantu, Fence M. “Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan dan Kemanfaatan dalam Putusan Hakim di Peradilan Perdata”. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum. Vol. 12 No. 3. September 2012. Pp. 479-489. DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2012.12.3.121.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2017.17.3.865

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


JURNAL DINAMIKA HUKUM Indexed by :
Crossref logo
 
   
   
   
   
   
  
 
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum
Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal SoedirmanCopyright of Jurnal Dinamika Hukum
Yustisia IV Building, Law Journal CenterISSN 2407-6562 (Online) ISSN 1410-0797 (Print)
Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia, 53122JDH is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License