JUSTICE DIALOGUE IN THE PROCESS OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE
Abstract
Criminal justice upholds law and justice based on material truth revealed in justice dialogue. Nowadays, the verdict of criminal justice does not reveal material truth. It is strongly presumed that there are some problems in justice dialogue. This normative juridical research with philosophical and conceptual approach describes the problems of justice dialogue in the process of criminal justice. Justice dialogue happened in the case of Blasphemy by Ahok and the case of Cocoa Stealing by Mina. The implementation of justice dialogue today is not in line with the principles of dialogue such as doubtful assumptions, freedom to have dialogue, imbalance chance of dialogue, sufficient attention, and best idea acceptance. Dialogue principles are violated in the case of blasphemy like sufficient attention and best idea acceptance. In the case of cacao stealing, the breaking of dialogue principles is doubtful assumptions, freedom to have dialogue, sufficient attention, and best idea acceptance. As a result, law and justice enforcement in criminal justice is not based on material truth.
Keywords: Dialogue Principles, Justice Dialogue, Criminal Justice.
Full Text:
PDF View
References
Anwar c. “Problematikan Mewujudkan Keadilan Substantif Dalam Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia”. Jurnal Konstitusi. Vol. 3 No. 1. June 2010. Pp. 127-140.
Sutiyoso, Bambang. “Mencari Format Ideal Keadilan Putusan Dalam Peradilan “. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM. Vol 17 No. 2. April 2010. Pp. 217-232. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol17.iss2.art4
Abra, Emy Hajar. “Konstruksi Sistem Hukum Indonesia”. Jurnal Dimensi Universitas Riau Kepulauan Batam. Vol. 5 No. 3 edition 2016. Pp.1-10.
Rengka, Frans J. 2003. Dialog Hukum dan Keadilan Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana (Studi Tentang Peradilan Pidana Sebagai Forum Dialog Dalam Kasus Pidana Politik Masa Orde Baru). Disertation. Doctoral Program of Law. UNDIP Semarang.
Rengka, Frans J. “Intitusi Peradilan, Hakim, dan Perannya dalam Masyarakat Lokal”. Jurnal Aequitas Iuris. Vol. 1 No. 1. July 2007.
Monteiro, Josef M. “Putusan Hakim Dalam Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia”. Jurnal Hukum Pro Justisia. Vol. 25 No. 2. Edition April 2007. Pp. 130-139.
Khairandy, Ridwan. “Landasan Filosofis Kekuatan Mengikatnya Kontrak”. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM. Vol. 18. Special Edition October 2011. Pp. 36-55.
Sunarto. “Asas Legalitas Dalam Penegakan Hukum Menuju Terwujudnya Keadilan Substantif” Jurnal Masalah - Masalah Hukum. Jilid 45 No. 4 Edition October 2016. Pp. 252-258. DOI : 10.14710/mmh.45.4.2016.252-258.
Bureni, Yunus P.S. 2011.Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah Dalam Upaya Mencapai Keadilan. Thesis. Magister Program of Law. Post-graduate.UNDANA. Kupang.
Bureni, Yunus P.S..“Moralitas Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah Dalam Upaya Mencapai Keadilan substantif”. Jurnal LEGISLASI INDONESIA. Vol.10 No. 2. June 2013. Pp. 123-132.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2018.18.1.894
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
JURNAL DINAMIKA HUKUM Indexed by :
 |  |  |
 |  |  |
 |  |  |
 |  |  |
 |  |  |
 |  |  |
 |  |  |
 |  |
 | Jurnal Dinamika Hukum |  |
| Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman | Copyright of Jurnal Dinamika Hukum | |
| Yustisia IV Building, Law Journal Center | ISSN 2407-6562 (Online) ISSN 1410-0797 (Print) | |
| Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia, 53122 | JDH is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License | |