An Analysis of Constitutional Court Verdict Number 28/PUU-XI/2013 on Law Number 17 of 2012 About Cooperatives

Marsitiningsih Marsitiningsih, Wafa Nihayati Inayah, Ade Muhammad Syamkirana Putra

Abstract


Article 33 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution and its Explanation which refers to the notion of a typical corporate structure because of the definition of cooperatives in Law Number 17 of 2012 concerning Cooperatives, it turns out that the philosophy is not in accordance with the nature of the economic structure as a joint venture and the kinship-based principle contained in Article 33 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution. Similarly, this understanding has apparently been elaborated in other articles in Law Number 17 of 2012 concerning Cooperatives, thus making the rights and obligations of members by making the supervisory authority too extensively and a capital scheme that prioritizes material and financial capital that overrides social capital which is precisely the fundamental characteristic of cooperatives as a distinct entity of economic actors based on the 1945 Constitution. On the other hand, cooperatives are the same and no different from limited liability companies. This has made cooperatives lose their constitutional soul as an entity of typical economic actors for a nation with a mutual cooperation philosophy.

Keywords: Cooperatives, Constitutional Court Verdict, Economy

Full Text:


PDF View

References


Ali, Zainuddin. 2009. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Amirudin, and Zainal Asikin. 2003. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly, and M Ali Safa’at. 2006. “Teori Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum.” Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia: 110.

Astawa, I Gede Panjta, and Suprin Na’a. 2008. Dinamika Hukum Dan Ilmu Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia. Bandung: PT Alumni.

Fuady, Munir. 2009. Teori Negara Hukum Modern. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.

Latif, H. Abdul. 2007. Fungsi Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Upaya Mewujudkan Negara Hukum Demokrasi. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Total Media.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. 2009. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.

MD, Mahfud. 2011. Membangun Politik Hukum, Menegakan Konstitusi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Patcha W, Andjar, Myra Rosana Bachtiar, and Nadia Maulisa Benemay. 2008. Hukum Koperasi Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana.

Pramesti, Tri Jata Ayu. “Arti ‘Menimbang’ Dan ‘Mengingat’ Dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.”

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 28/PUU-XI/2013. 2013.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. 1998. Penyusunan Undang-Undang Yang Demokratis”, Dalam Seminar “Mencari Model Ideal Penyusunan Undang-Undang Yang

Demokratis Dan Kongres Asosiasi Sosiologi Hukum Indonesia. Semarang.

Sahbani, Agus. “Undang-Undang Perkoperasian Dibatalkan Karena Berjiwa Korporasi.” Hukumonline.com.

Yuliandri. 2010. Asas-Asas Pembentukan Peraturan Yang Baik, Gagasan Pembentukan Undang-Undang Berkelanjutan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2022.22.2.3391

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.





JURNAL DINAMIKA HUKUM Indexed by :
Crossref logo 
 
   
   
   
   
   
  

 
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum
Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal SoedirmanCopyright of Jurnal Dinamika Hukum
Yustisia IV Building, Law Journal CenterISSN 2407-6562 (Online) ISSN 1410-0797 (Print)
Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia, 53122JDH is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License