Settlement of Double Certificate Cases in Bandung (Case Study of Judge’s Decision Number: 976k/Pdt/2015)

Soediro Soediro, Efi Miftah Faridli, Dhea Anggit Dwiana


One of the objectives of the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) is to provide legal certainty for all people and enable the functioning of earth, air, and space, as well as natural wealth that aspired. However, the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) has not provided legal certainty over land, one of which is a plot of land with more than one certificate with the same object. The factors causing the occurrence of multiple certificates are caused by the community and the government from the National Land Agency, which does not have a valid database as referred to by Supreme Court Decision Number 976 K/PDT/2015. The formulation of the problem in this research is how efforts to prevent the occurrence of multiple certificates (overlapping) and what are the obstacles in preventing their occurrence double certificate (overlapping). This research aims to determine and analyze the prevention efforts and constraints in preventing the occurrence of double certificates (overlapping). The problems in this study were studied using a normative juridical method using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach—data collection techniques using studies bibliography and assistance and defense of legal facts. According to the research findings, efforts to prevent the occurrence of double certificates (overlapping), specifically by optimizing administration land use and creating land registration maps, so that if there are indications of the occurrence of double certificates, they can be canceled as soon as possible, as well as obstacles in preventing double certificates (Overlapping), specifically the lack of understanding and enthusiasm from the community in applying for their land in Complete Systematic Land Registration (Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap, PTSL), are shown.

Keywords: Double certificate; legal certainty; overlapping.

Full Text:

PDF View


Badan Pusat Statistik. “Statistik Infrastruktur Indonesia 2020 (Hasil Pemutakhiran Data,’ Perkembangan Desa 2020) Https://Www.Bps.Go.Id/Publication/2021/04/28/7ce2f71435c1893e239bf22d/Statis tik-Infrastruktur-Indonesia-2020-Hasil-Pemutakhiran-Data-Perkembangan Desa-2020-.H.

Citra, M. E. A. (2020). Eksistensi Program Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap (PTSL) dalam Mencegah Terbitnya Sertipikat Ganda Di Kantor Pertanahan Kota Denpasar, Jurnal Hukum Saraswati, Vol.2 (1). 1-15.

Hanggara, A.C. (2013). Pelaksanaan Konversi Hak Atas Tanah Adat (LETTER C) Menjadi Hak Milik Di Kabupaten Magelang. Ilmu Hukum.

Harsono, B. (1992). Kegunaan Sertifikat dan Permasalahannya. Yogyakarta: Seminar Nasional Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata).

………………….. (1999). Hukum Agraria Indonesia. Jakarta: Penerbit Djambatan.

Hartanto, A. (2009). Problematika Hukum Jual Beli Tanah Belum Bersertifikat. Yogyakarta: LaksBang Mediatama.

Salim, Agus. (2019). Penyelesaian Sengketa Hukum Terhadap Pemegang Sertifikat Hak Milik Dengan Adanya Penerbitan Sertifikat

Ganda, Jurnal USM Law Review, Vol.2 (2). 174-187.

Sasmita, A.A., Ma’ruf Hafidz & Hasbuddin Khalid. (2022) Penerapan Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Terhadap Pendaftaran Hak Milik atas Tanah sebagai Upaya Mencegah Terjadinya Sertipikat Ganda. Journal of Generalis, Vol.3 (5). 1140-1158.

Soekamto, S. & Sri Madmuji. (2009). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Syah, M.I. (2014). Sertifikat Tanah Ganda Akibat Lemahnya Database Pertanahan, Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, Vol.4 (2). 44-56.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Crossref logo 

Jurnal Dinamika Hukum
Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal SoedirmanCopyright of Jurnal Dinamika Hukum
Yustisia IV Building, Law Journal CenterISSN 2407-6562 (Online) ISSN 1410-0797 (Print)
Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia, 53122JDH is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License