Legal Loophole Related to Ensuring Civil Rights in the Use of Drones With Spying Purposes in Indonesia
Abstract
Education, economy, and technology are three fields that cannot be separated from the constantly evolving changes. The use of drones as one of the tangible forms of rapid technological development in Indonesia has great potential to cause losses and adverse impacts on national sovereignty. Through this research, the authors will focus on dissecting the legal loophole related to the regulation of drone use that has yet to be comprehensive and has yet to be received attention from the Indonesian people. The guarantee of rights for civil society is an important issue that has yet to be eradicated, especially in terms of the use of drones for spying purposes in Indonesia. This research is a normative juridical research, processing techniques of statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The results of this study state that Indonesia has yet to formulate comprehensive drone regulations, so it is urgent to make detailed rules regarding the classification of drones for recreation and non-recreation/business in order to protect the rights of the affected communities. The research is also compared to a real case in Florida to emphasize the fact that Indonesia is very far away in terms of regulations to protect the rights of its people in terms of the use of drones for spying purposes. This research’s final result and objective focuses on answering the legal vacuum related to guaranteeing civil society’s rights to use drones for spying purposes.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amaritasari, I. (2015). Keamanan Nasional dalam Konsep dan Standar Internasional. Jurnal Keamanan Nasional. https://doi.org/10.31599/jkn.v1i2.21
Amin, R., Al Aziz, M. F., Manalu, I., & Ishanti Nurjanah Rahayu R. (2022). Aspek Hukum Pengoperasian Pesawat Udara Tanpa Awak Menurut Hukum Positif di Indonesia. KRTHA BHAYANGKARA. https://doi.org/10.31599/krtha.v16i1.976
Clarke, R., & Bennett Moses, L. (2014). The regulation of civilian drones’ impacts on public safety. Computer Law and Security Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2014.03.007
CNBC. (2020). Drone Mata-mata AS Melintas di Laut China Selatan, Ada Apa? https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20200717163434-4-173616/drone-mata-mata-as-melintas-di-laut-china-selatan-ada-apa
detik.com. (2014). Drone Agen Real Estate, Sorot Gambar Tetangga Sedang Berjemur. https://news.detik.com/abc-australia/d-2750752/drone-agen-real-estate-sorot-gambar-tetangga-sedang-berjemur
detik.com. (2020). Drone Jatuh di Candi Borobudur. https://news.detik.com/berita-jawa-tengah/d-5231411/drone-jatuh-di-candi-borobudur
Dewi, K. T. F., & Sudiarta, I. K. (2020). Pengaturan Penggunaan Drone Untuk Patroli Batas Wilayah Negara Di Indonesia. Jurnal Kertha Desa, 10(12), 1391–1402.
Enemark, C. (2021). Armed Drones and Ethical Policing: Risk, Perception, and the Tele-Present Officer. Criminal Justice Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2021.1943844
Firmansyah, M. Z., & Puspitasari, P. (2021). Pemanfaatan Drone sebagai Bagian dari Kontra Terorisme. Nakhoda: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan. https://doi.org/10.35967/njip.v20i1.148
Fox, S. (2022). Drones: Foreseeing…. A ‘Risky’ Business? Policing the Challenge that Flies Above. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4109024
Fox, S. J. (2017). The Rise of the Drones: Framework and Governance - Why Risk It. Journal of Air Law and Commerce, 82(4), 683–716. https://heinonline.org/HOL/License
Janzen, T. (2016). How a 1940’s Chicken Farmer Case Answered: Who Owns the Sky? JANZEN AG TECH BLOG. https://www.aglaw.us/janzenaglaw/2016/1/28/united-states-v-causby-the-1940s-chicken-farmer-case-that-will-impact-drone-law
Kompas. (2015). Drone Mata-Mata China Ditemukan di Laut Indonesia, Ternyata Ini yang Ketiga Kalinya. https://www.kompas.tv/article/134761/drone-mata-mata-china-ditemukan-di-laut-indonesia-ternyata-ini-yang-ketiga-kalinya
Kristanti, E. Y. (2015). Keren, Aksi Armada Elite Polisi Jepang Jaring “Drone Liar.” Liputan 6. https://www.liputan6.com/amp/2388298/keren-aksi-armada-elite-polisi-jepang-jaring-drone-liar
Liputan6. (2016). Kisah Drone Pantau Santoso di Hutan Poso. https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/2560032/kisah-drone-pantau-santoso-di-hutan-poso
Mustofa, A. (2021). The Use of Drones: From the Perspective of Regulation and National Defense and Security. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(10), 670–677.
Nasution, M. S. A. (2016). Hukum Dalam Pendekatan Filsafat. Kencana.
Nurfitriyanti. (2021). Analisis Hukum Pengoperasian Pesawat Tanpa Awak (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) di Wilayah Udara Indoensia [Universitas Hasanuddin]. http://repository.unhas.ac.id/id/eprint/5373/
Praditya, Y. (2016). Keamanan Di Indonesia : Sebuah Kajian Strategis. Nadi Pustaka.
Prastya, S. E., Cipta, S. P., & Nugraha, B. (2020). Analisis Log Penerbangan Pada Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Sebagai Barang Bukti Digital. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Universitas Lambung Mangkurat (JTIULM). https://doi.org/10.20527/jtiulm.v5i1.42
Prayogi, C. R. (2017a). Urgensi Pengaturan Tentang Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Menurut Perspektif Hukum Udara Internasional. Universitas Brawijaya.
Prayogi, C. R. (2017b). Urgensi Pengaturan Tentang Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Menurut Perspektif Hukum Udara Internasional (Skripsi). Universitas Brawijaya.
Putra, A. K., Faradilla, A., & Sipahutar, B. (2022). Underwater Drone: Aset Militer, Perangkat Penelitian dan Kedaulatan. PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum. https://doi.org/10.33019/progresif.v16i2.2509
Rodday, N. M., De Schmidt, R. O., & Pras, A. (2016). Exploring security vulnerabilities of unmanned aerial vehicles. Proceedings of the NOMS 2016 - 2016 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium. https://doi.org/10.1109/NOMS.2016.7502939
Setiono. (2004). Rule of Law (Supremasi Hukum). Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Smith, J. J. (2014). Beyond the Horizon: Developing Future Airpower Strategy. Strategic Studies Quarterly.
Statista Research Department. (2024). Revenue of the drones industry in Indonesia 2019-2028. https://www.statista.com/forecasts/1235719/total-market-revenue-drones-devices-indonesia
Taeihagh, A., & Lim, H. S. M. (2019). Governing autonomous vehicles: emerging responses for safety, liability, privacy, cybersecurity, and industry risks. Transport Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2018.1494640
Tribunnews. (2022). Detik-detik KKB Papua Panik Markasnya Didatangi Drone TNI-Polri, Separatis Langsung Kocar-kacir. https://surabaya.tribunnews.com/2022/08/11/detik-detik-kkb-papua-panik-markasnya-didatangi-drone-tni-polri-separatis-langsung-kocar-kacir
Uchidiuno, J., Manweiler, J., & Weisz, J. D. (2018). Privacy and fear in the drone era: Preserving privacy expectations through technology. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3188457
Utama, A. B., & Anwar, S. (2021). Sejarah Penggunaan Pesawat Terbang Tanpa Awak (PTTA) Dalam Perang Modern Dan Persiapan Militer Indonesia. Jurnal Pertahanan & Bela Negara. https://doi.org/10.33172/jpbh.v11i3.1190
Wall, T., & Monahan, T. (2011). Surveillance and violence from afar: The politics of drones and liminal security-scapes. Theoretical Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480610396650
Zakaria, N., & Sasmini. (2015). Legalitas Penggunaan Drone yang Melintasi Batas Negara Berdasarkan Hukum Internasional. Belli Ac Pacis, 1(1), 15–24.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2024.24.1.3947
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
JURNAL DINAMIKA HUKUM Indexed by :
 |  | |
 |  | |
 | Jurnal Dinamika Hukum |  |
| Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman | Copyright of Jurnal Dinamika Hukum | |
| Yustisia IV Building, Law Journal Center | ISSN 2407-6562 (Online) ISSN 1410-0797 (Print) | |
| Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia, 53122 | JDH is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License | |