BINDING FORCE OF CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW DECISION OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT TOWARD SUPREME COURT
Abstract
The Supreme Court decision which sentenced dr. Bambang suprapto.Sp.M.Surg. using article 76 of Law No 29 Year 2004 on the Practice of Medicine which had been annulled by the Constitutional Court has proved that the Supreme Court has put aside constitutional court's decision on constitutional review. This paper attempts to justify that at any reason, Constitutional Review decision of Constitutional Court still has binding force on the Supreme Court. It is based on four perspectives: 1. Historical perspective 2. Protected object perspective 3. Functional perspective, and 4. Normative perspective.
Keywords: Binding Force, Constitutional Review, Constitutional Court, Supreme Court.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ali, Mahrus. “Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Penafsiran Hukum yang Progresif”. Jurnal Konstitusi. Vol 7. No 1. February 2010 Edition. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi.
Handoyo, Dandi. “Dinamika Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi”. Jurnal Yudisial. Vol IV. No 8. April 2011 Edition. Jakarta:Komisi Yudisial.
Huda, Ni’matul. “Pola Pengaturan Pemilukada dan Perluasan Keadilan Substantif”. Jurnal Konstitusi. Vol 8. No 2. April 2011 Edition. Jakarta: Sekertariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi.
Soeprapto, Maria Farida Indrati. 1998. Ilmu Perundang-Undangan, Dasar-dasar dan pembentukannya. Yogyakarta: Kanisius. page 176.
Kurniawan, Hadi. “Dinamika Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi”. Jurnal Konstitusi. Vol 3. No 4. 12 February 2008 Edition. Sekertariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi.
MD, Moh Mahfud. “Gagasan Pembentukan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia”. Jurnal Sintesis. Vol 3. No 9. May 1999 Edition. Jakarta:Law Faculty of UI.
Naskah Akademik Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi.
Nope, Bill. “Pengawasan terhadap Hakim Konstitusi”. Jurnal Konstitusi. Vol III. No. 1. June 2010 Edition. Jakarta:Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik indonesia.
Satrio. “Erga Omnes Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi”. Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol 11. No. V. March 2014 Edition. Jakarta: Sekertariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi.
Slamet, Titon Kurnia. 2013. Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Sang Penjaga Ham (the guardian of human rights). Bandung:PT. Alumni.
Suharizal. “Penguatan Demokrasi Lokal Melalui Penghapusan Jabatan Wakil Kepala Daerah”. Jurnal Konstitusi. Vol 7. No 5. October 2010 Edition. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi.
Sutiyoso, Bammbang. “Pemihakan Hakim Terhadap Keadilan Susbstantif Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepemilikan Atas Tanah”. Jurnal Yudisial. Vol 5. No. 3. December 2012 Edition. Jakarta: Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia.
Tatang, Slamet.“Mahkamah Konstitusi Sang Penjaga HAM”. Jurnal Konstitusi. Vol 11. No 3. February 2009 Edition. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2016.16.3.449
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
JURNAL DINAMIKA HUKUM Indexed by :
 |  | |
 |  | |
 | Jurnal Dinamika Hukum |  |
| Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman | Copyright of Jurnal Dinamika Hukum | |
| Yustisia IV Building, Law Journal Center | ISSN 2407-6562 (Online) ISSN 1410-0797 (Print) | |
| Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia, 53122 | JDH is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License | |