AN ANNULLED AWARD CANNOT BE ENFORCED UNDER THE NEW YORK CONVENTION
Abstract
Arbitral award is final and binding. A concept of “binding” is fundamental in International arbitral award. Nevertheless, the focus commonly concerns about the annulment and/or deferment of International arbitral award so that it could not be implemented. However, the New York Convention does not govern this issue. In addition, international arbitral awards must meet the following requirements: the award is made in the territory other than conflicting countries, and/ or it is not considered a domestic awards in the State where recognition and enforcement is sought. This is important because the enforcement proceedings between foreign and domestic awards are different. This article elaborates the principles of the recognition and enforcement of a foreign award and the grounds or criteria for refusing to enforce an award are limited to the specific defenses i.e. public policy. The party opposing enforcement bears the burden of proofin the existence of the enumerated defenses.
Keywords: binding, annullment, deferment, acknowledgement and enforcement of arbitral award.
Full Text:
PDF View
References
Bermann, George A. “Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: The Application of the New York Convention by National Courts”. (Unpublished manuscript) (On file with the New York University Law Review). Available at http://www.iacl2014congress.com/fileadmin/user_upload/k_iacl2014congress/General_reports/Bermann_-_General_Report_Recognition__Enforcement_of_Foreign_Awards_July_2_2014__2_.pdf. Accessed on February 18th 2017.
Binder, Peter. 2010. International Commercial Arbitration and Conciliation in UNCITRAL Model Law Jurisdictions. 3rd edition. England: Sweet & Maxwell;
Bintoro, Rahadi Wasi. “Restrictions on the Religious Judiciarys’ Authority as a Result of judicial power conflict rules”. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum. Vol. 15 No. 2. May 2015. Purwokerto: Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman;
Blessing, Marc. “The New York Convention: The Major Problem Areas. in: The New York Convention of 1958”. ASA Special Series No. 9. 1996. Zurich: Swiss Arbitration Association;
Goldstein, Marc J. “Setting Aside N.Y. Convention Awards Made in the U.S.”. Dispute Resolution Journal. 64 no. 2. July 2009. New York: Juris Publishing;
Jan van den Berg, Albert. “When Is an Arbitral Award Non Domestic under New York Convention of 1958?”. Pace Law Review. Vol. 6 Issue I. Fall September 1985. Rev. 25. New York: Pace Law School;
Jan van den Berg, Albert. 2003. Yearbook Commercial Arbitration 2003 – Volume XXVIII. The Hague. Netherlands: Kluwer Law International;
Jan van den Berg, Albert. 2006. Yearbook Commercial Arbitration 2006 – Volume XXXI. The Hague. Netherlands: Kluwer Law International;
Khan, Almas. “The Interaction between Shariah and International Law in Arbitration”. Chicago Journal of International Law. Vol. 6 No. 2. Article 16. Chicago: The University of Chicago;
Koch, Christopher. “The Enforcement of Awards Annuled in Their Place of Origin: The French and U.S. Experience”. Journal of International Arbitration, Vol. 26 No. 2, 2009. Kluwer Law International: The Netherlands;
Martinez, Ramona. “Recognition and Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards Under the United Nations Convention of 1958: The "Refusal" Provisions”. American Bar Association. Vol. 24 No. 2. Summer 1990. 24 Int'l Law. 48724 Int'l Law. 487. New York: the International Lawyer;
Petrochilos, G C. ”Enforcing Awards Annulled in their State of Origin under the New York Convention’. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. Vol. 48 No. 4. 1999. New York: Cambridge University Press;
Petsche, Markus A. 2005. “The Growing Autonomy of International Commercial Arbitration”. Munchen: Sellier European Law Publishers;
Rosenhouse, Michael A. “Confirmation of Foreign Arbitral Award under Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards”. American Law Reports. 194 A.L.R. Fed. 291. 2004. New York: Thomson Reuters;
Sanders, Pieter. “The Making of the Convention”. Speech. The papers presented at "New York Convention Day". That colloquium was held in the Trusteeship Council Chamber of the United Nations Headquarters. New York on 10 June 1998 to celebrate the 40th anniversary of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards concluded on 10 June 1958. New York. 1999. available from https://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/arbitration/NY-conv/NYCDay-e.pdf. Accessed on June 11th 2010.
Smit, Hans. “Annulment of an Arbitral Award and Its Subsequent Enforcement: Two Recent Decisions”. American Review of International Arbitration. 19 Am. Rev. Int'l Arb. 187. 2008. Virginia: Washington & Lee Law School;
Strong, S I. “What Constitutes an “Agreement in Writing” in International Commercial Arbitration? Conflicts between the New York Convention and the Federal Arbitration Act”. 48 Stan. J. Int'l L. 47. Stanford Journal of International Law. Winter 2012. Standford: Standford Law School;
Sujayadi. “Interaction between the Setting Aside of an Award and Leave for Enforcement”. Yuridika. Vol. 30 No. 2. Mei-Agustus 2015. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2017.17.2.784
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
JURNAL DINAMIKA HUKUM Indexed by :
 |  | |
 |  | |
 | Jurnal Dinamika Hukum |  |
| Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman | Copyright of Jurnal Dinamika Hukum | |
| Yustisia IV Building, Law Journal Center | ISSN 2407-6562 (Online) ISSN 1410-0797 (Print) | |
| Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia, 53122 | JDH is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License | |