PENERAPAN HUKUM EKSEKUSI PENETAPAN IMBALAN JASA KURATOR YANG TIDAK SESUAI DENGAN PASAL 17 AYAT (2) UU K-PKPU

Theresia Simatupang, Rhonald Sianturi Hasudungan

Abstract


Abstract

 

This article discusses the execution of curator reward in terms of bankruptcy cancellation by Supreme Court in which Article 17 subsection (2) of Bankruptcy Law regulates that the decision is performed by the judge assembly on Final Appeal/Judicial Review. However, it is practically carried out by the judges of the Commercial Court. The method of this research is juridical normative. The result of this research indicates that the decision of curator reward execution in contrast with Article 17 subsection (2) of Bankruptcy Law could not be executed. Consequently, the injured party may take civil lawsuit, request for annulment of the decision to the Supreme Court or file judicial review.

 

Key words: execution of judge decision, curator reward, bankruptcy cancellation


Full Text:


PDF View


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2014.14.1.276

Refbacks






JURNAL DINAMIKA HUKUM Indexed by :
Crossref logo
 
   
   
   
   
   
  

 
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum
Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal SoedirmanCopyright of Jurnal Dinamika Hukum
Yustisia IV Building, Law Journal CenterISSN 2407-6562 (Online) ISSN 1410-0797 (Print)
Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia, 53122JDH is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License