Collaborative Governance in Tackling Prostitution in Pemalang Regency

Tobirin Tobirin, Abdul Aziz Nasihuddin, Kadar Pamuji

Abstract


This article is driven by the complexity of handling prostitution, from economic issues, conflicts of interest, poor communication coordination, to the absence of collaboration between stakeholders. This study aimed to analyze the implementation and obstacles of collaborative governance in dealing with prostitution in Pemalang Regency. A social-juridical research methodology through the  combination of doctrinal-normative legal research and social as well as social science approaches was selected for this study, while data collection were obtained through focus group discussions and secondary data. The study results showed that the implementation of collaborative governance in handling prostitution in Pemalang Regency has not been optimal, with ineffective communication identified between stakeholders. In addition, the barriers to the collaborative process include conflicts of interest in the handling of prostitution issues that give rise to differing perceptions among the health service providers, security forces, and religious leaders; ineffective institutional design; and the reliance to the deparment in charge of handling public order. The lack of shared commitment to address prostitution issue in a planned and measurable manner in adherence to local regulations remains a challenge to be resolved.

Keywords: barriers, collaborative, handling, prostitution.


Full Text:


PDF View

References


Amalia, N. (2018). Pengembangan Kapasitas Masyarakat Berdampak Lokalisasi Jarak-Dolly oleh Pemerintah Kota Surabaya. 1–12.

Anindia, I. A., & Sularto, R. B. (2019). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Upaya Penanggulangan Prostitusi Sebagai Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia. 1 (1). 18. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v1i1.18-30.

Atobauka, S. (2021). Poverty and Women en Prostitution in Nigeria : A Study of Wukari Local Government Area. Taraba State. M (9). 42–54.

Benoit, C., Smith, M., Jansson, M., Healey, P., & Magnuson, D. (2019). “The Prostitution Problem”: Claims, Evidence, and Policy Outcomes. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 48 (7). 1905–1923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1276-6.

Berliandaldo, M., Chodiq, A., & Fryantoni, D. (2021). Kolaborasi dan Sinergitas Antar Stakeholder dalam Pembangunan Berkelanjutan Sektor Pariwisata Di Kebun Raya Cibinong. INOBIS: Jurnal Inovasi Bisnis dan Manajemen Indonesia. 4 (2). 221–234. https://doi.org/10.31842/jurnalinobis.v4i2.179.

Chalid, I. F., & Djanggih, H. (2021). Tinjauan Kriminologi Terhadap Kejahatan Protitusi Online di Kota Makassar (Studi Kasus Aplikasi Mi Chat). Kalabbirang Law Journal. 3 (2). 1–13. http://jurnal.ahmar.id/index.php/kalabbirang86.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Mixed Methods Procedures. In Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches.

Ervianti, M. (2018). Faktor-Faktor Yang Menghambat Collaborative Governance Dalam Implementasi Manajemen dan Rekayasa Lalu Lintas di Kota Pekanbaru. Jom Fisip. 5. 1–13.

Fadri, Zainal. (2020). Perubahan Struktural Fungsional Prostitusi Online dalam Pandangan Talcott Parsons. RESIPROKAL: Jurnal Riset Sosiologi Progresif Aktual. 2 (2). 211–223. https://doi.org/10.29303/resiprokal.v2i2.40.

González, E. A., & Garrido, Á. A. (2022). Prostitution and Deservingness in Times of Pandemic: State (Non) Protection of Sex Workers in Spain. Social Sciences. 11 (5). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11050199.

Hidayat, R., & Syamsuddin, S. (2019). Penetrasi Konteks Sosial Budaya Dalam Membangun Collaborative Governance Pada Gugus Tugas Pencegahan dan Penanganan Korban Perdagangan Orang Kekerasan Terhadap Perempuan dan Anak di Provinsi Jawa Barat. Jurnal Politikom Indonesiana. 4 (1). 240–270. https://doi.org/10.35706/jpi.v4i1.2004.

Irwansyah, L. (2016). Kemiskinan , Keluarga dan Prostitusi pada Remaja. Psycology Forum UMM. 214.

Kusnadi, I. H. (2020). Jejaring Collaborative Governance Pada Program Komunikasi, Informasi dan Edukasi (KIE) dalam Pencegahan HIV/AIDS di Kabupaten Subang. Ijd-Demos. 1 (2). 204–231. https://doi.org/10.31506/ijd.v1i2.21.

Kusumawati, A., & Rochaeti, N. (2019). Memutus Mata Rantai Praktik Prostitusi Di Indonesia Melalui Kriminalisasi Pengguna Jasa Prostitusi. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia. 1 (3). 366–378. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v1i3.366-378.

Laily, D. A., & Aulia, A. N. (2016). Penanggulangan Prostitusi Perspektif Hadist. Lentera. XVIII (2). 43–58.

M. Agha Novrians, & Mailin. (2020). Komunikasi Pemerintah Kota Medan Dalam Menanggulangi Penyakit Masyarakat. AL-HIKMAH: Media Dakwah, Komunikasi, Sosial dan Budaya. 11 (1). 29–35. https://doi.org/10.32505/hikmah.v11i1.1829.

Mahardika, M. D. G. (2020). Prostitusi di Surabaya Pada Akhir Abad Ke-19. Sejarah dan Budaya: Jurnal Sejarah, Budaya, dan Pengajarannya. 14 (1). 22. https://doi.org/10.17977/um020v14i12020p22-30.

Mufrohim, O., & Setiyono, J. (2021). Kebijakan Hukum Penutupan Lokalisasi Sunan Kuning dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Prostitusi Online Di Kota Semarang. Ajudikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. 4 (2). 113–124. https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v4i2.2265.

Muta’al, M. R. (2022). Collaborative Governance dalam Penanganan Pandemi Covid-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) di Kelurahan Mangkubumen, Kecamatan Banjarsari, Kota Surakarta. Solidaritas. 19. https://ejurnal.unisri.ac.id/index.php/sldrts/article/view/7227%0Ahttps://ejurnal.unisri.ac.id/index.php/sldrts/article/view/7227/4596.

Nurgiansah, T. H. (2020). Fenomena Prostitusi Online di Kota Yogyakarta dalam Perspektif Nilai Kemanusiaan Yang Adil dan Beradab. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan. 17 (1). 27. https://doi.org/10.24114/jk.v17i1.14208.

Persiliya, M., Tandyonomanu, D., Sos, S., & Si, M. (2020). Peran Komunikasi Lembaga Swadaya Masyarakat Dalam Upaya Pemeberdayaan Perempuan Pekerja Seks Komersian di Kabupaten Kediri (Studi Kasus LSM SUAR Indonesia). Commercium. 02 (02). 113–119. https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/26/article/view/31638%0Ahttps://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/26/article/viewFile/31638/28703.

Roem, E. R., & Fortunela, D. (2021). Vol. 3 No.5 Edisi 3 Desember 2021 http://jurnal.ensiklopediaku.org Ensiklopedia of Journal (Vol. 3, Issue 5, pp. 8–13).

Rusyidi, B., & Nurwati, N. (2019). Penanganan Pekerja Seks Komersial di Indonesia. Prosiding Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat. 5 (3). 303. https://doi.org/10.24198/jppm.v5i3.20579.

Sagala, E., Sihotang, N., Efendi, Z., & Febriyana, A. (2020). Prostitution as Social Pathology: A Legal and Criminological Perspective. Law Research Review Quarterly. 6 (2). 91–100. https://doi.org/10.15294/lrrq.v6i2.31109.

Septiani, E., Muhammadiah, & Mappamiring. (2021). Faktor Pendukung dan Penghambat Collaborative Governance dalam Pengelolaan Ruang Terbuka Hijau. JPPM: Journal of Public Policy and Management. 3 (1). 1–6.

Setiawati, D. P., Juwandi, R., Fitrayadi, D. S., Sultan, U., & Tirtayasa, A. (2022). Analisis Dinas Sosial Dalam Penangan Prostitusi di Kota Serang. 10 (2). 476–487.

Sudarmo. (2019). Community Governance of Prostitution: Social Rehabilitation for Sex Workers Through Social Capital. Jurnal Borneo Administrator. 15 (2). 117-136. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v15i2.446.

Trisniati, E., Cadith, J., & Sapto Nugroho, K. (2022). Collaborative Governance Dalam Pengembangan Kawasan Ekonomi Khusus. Jurnal Governansi. 8 (1). 59–68. https://doi.org/10.30997/jgs.v8i1.4379.

Yanto, O. (2016). Prostitusi Online Sebagai Kejahatan Kemanusiaan terhadap Anak: Telaah Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif. AHKAM: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah. 16 (2). 187–196. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v16i2.4449.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2022.22.3.3302

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


JURNAL DINAMIKA HUKUM Indexed by :
Crossref logo
 
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum
Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal SoedirmanCopyright of Jurnal Dinamika Hukum
Yustisia IV Building, Law Journal CenterISSN 2407-6562 (Online) ISSN 1410-0797 (Print)
Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia, 53122JDH is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License