The Criminal Law Policy on the General Election System in Indonesia
Abstract
General elections are a crucial pillar of democracy in Indonesia, allowing citizen participation in selecting leaders and shaping policies. Strong criminal law policies are necessary to preserve the integrity of elections, despite challenges in consistent law enforcement and clear definitions of election violations. The aim of this research is to assess the implementation and effectiveness of criminal law policies in preventing and addressing election violations in Indonesia and to identify their impact on the election process. The research findings indicate that the implementation of criminal law policies in preventing and addressing election violations is crucial. This is achieved through stringent election regulations, strict enforcement of criminal sanctions, careful monitoring and investigation, and swift handling of violations. The effectiveness of criminal law policies is also evident in deterring violations, ensuring transparency in funding, and active citizen participation in monitoring. Criminal law policies have a significant impact on the election process. Positive impacts include efforts to prevent election crimes, protect voting rights, and address election law violations through strict regulations. Prevention of election crimes such as spreading false information and the use of violence is tightly regulated to maintain election integrity. Protecting voters' rights is a focal point, with prohibitions against bribery and intimidation practices. However, the negative impact lies in the potential misuse of criminal law for political purposes, which can undermine the principles of presumption of innocence and human rights.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alvons, M. (2018). KEBEBASAN KEAMANAN, KEADILAN DAN KEDAMAIAN DALAM PEMILIHAN UMUM UNTUK STABILITAS NEGARA. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 15(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v15i4.252
Anggara, S. (2015). Sistem Politik Indonesia. In Sistem Politik Indonesia (pp. 22–24). CV Pustaka Setia.
Cerdas, F. A., & Afandi, H. (2019). Jaminan Perlindungan Hak Pilih dan Kewajiban Negara Melindungi Hak Pilih Warga Negara dalam Konstitusi (Kajian Kritis Pemilu Serentak 2019). SASI, 25(1), 72. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v25i1.142
Dewa, M. J., Sensu, L., Haris, O. K., Tatawu, G., Sinapoy, M. S., & Lasiyantohadi, D. (2023). Tanggung Jawab Pejabat Berwenang dalam Menerbitkan Persetujuan Penggunaan Kawasan Hutan untuk Usaha Pertambangan. Halu Oleo Legal Research, 5(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33772/holresch.v5i1.225
Fahrika, A. I., & Zulkifli. (2020). PEREKONOMIAN INDONESIA SEJARAH DAN PERKEMBANGANNYA. Yayasan Barcode.
Gunawan. (2021). PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA POLITIK UANG DALAM PEMILIHAN UMUM TAHUN 2019 (STUDI KASUS PADA BAWASLU KOTA BATAM). Universitas Putera Batam.
Isra, S. (2016). Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Penguatan Hak Asasi Manusia Di Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 11(3), 409. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1131
Junaidi, V. (2013). PELIBATAN DAN PARTISIPASI MASYARAKAT DALAM PENGAWASAN PEMILU. Perkumpulan untuk Pemilu dan Demokrasi (Perludem) Bekerjasama dengan The Asia Foundation (TAF).
Kholis, N., Ningtyas, D. P. A., & Putri, A. A. (2022). MODEL-MODEL PILKADA SERENTAK 2020 GUNA MEMBANGUN PEMERINTAHAN DEMOKRATIS PASCA COVID-19. JIS: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 2(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/jis.v2i1.5
Maroni. (2016). PENGANTAR POLITIK HUKUM PIDANA. CV Anugrah Utama Raharja.
Maulana, M. I., & Mustikaningsih, R. M. (2017). Ketidakpastian Hukum Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Administrasi Dalam Proses Rekapitulasi Hasil Pemilu. Evaluasi Pemilu Serentak 2019 Bidang Evaluasi Aspek Hukum Pemilu, 1(2), 83–100.
Nursadi, H. (2012). Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Universitas Terbuka. https://jdih.situbondokab.go.id/barang/buku/30. Sistem Hukum Indonesia by Harsanto Nursadi (z-lib.org).pdf
Ohman, M. (2013). Buku Pedoman Pengawasan Keuangan Politik. International Foundation for Electoral Systems.
Patarai, M. I. (2020). KEBIJAKAN PUBLIK DAERAH POSISI DAN DIMENSINYA DALAM PERSPEKTIF DESENTRALISASI KEBIJAKAN. De La Macca.
Pratiwi, C. S., Purnamawati, S. A., Fauzi, & Purbawati, C. Y. (2016). Penjelasan Hukum Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik. Lembaga Kajian dan Advokasi untuk Independensi Peradilan (LeIP).
Riyanto, S., Febrian, & Zanibar, Z. (2023). Bhinneka Tunggal Ika: Nilai Dan Formulasinya Dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 20(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v20i2.993
Santoso, T. (2007). KAJIAN KEBIJAKAN: SISTEM PENEGAKAN HUKUM PEMILU [2009 – 2014]. TIM PENELITI PERLUDEM.
Sedarmayanti. (2019). STRATEGI PENGUATAN ETIKA DAN INTEGRITAS BIROKRASI DALAM RANGKA PENCEGAHAN KORUPSI GUNA MENINGKATKAN KUALITAS PELAYANAN. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Dan Praktek Administrasi, 9(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31113/jia.v9i3.311
Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia. (2019). Memperkuat Peradaban Hukum dan Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia.
Simarmata, M. H. (2018). HAMBATAN TRANSPARANSI KEUANGAN PARTAI POLITIK DAN KAMPANYE PEMILIHAN UMUM. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 15(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v15i1.13
Suhariyono. (2009). PENENTUAN SANKSI PIDANA DALAM SUATU UNDANG-UNDANG. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 6(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v6i4.337
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2023.23.3.3782
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
JURNAL DINAMIKA HUKUM Indexed by :
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum | ||
Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman | Copyright of Jurnal Dinamika Hukum | |
Yustisia IV Building, Law Journal Center | ISSN 2407-6562 (Online) ISSN 1410-0797 (Print) | |
Purwokerto, Central Java, Indonesia, 53122 | JDH is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License | |