THE ROLE OF INDONESIAN MEDICAL DISCIPLINARY BOARD’S VERDICT ON MEDICAL DISCIPLINARY VIOLATION IN MEDICAL DISPUTES SETTLEMENT

Nayla - Alawiya

Abstract


Whether there is medical disciplinary violation or not is decided by Indonesian Medical Disciplinary Board (MKDKI) according to the mandate of Article 55 of Law Number 29 Year 2004 on Medical Practice. Article 66 paragraph (3) of Law Number 29 Year 2004 also grants right for every person whose interest are violated by a doctor or dentist’s act during their medical practice to report the alleged criminal offense to the authority or file a civil lawsuit to court. The provision potentially weakens MKDKI’s verdict role in medical dispute settlement. The result shows that MKDKI in medical dispute settlement contribute to provide written real evidence. It can be medical dispute settlement by mediation, a report to the authority or a suit to court. The role of MKDKI’s verdict is still hampered by several factors including law, law enforcement, facilities and cultural factors.

 

Keywords: Medical Dispute; Doctors and Dentists; Disciplinary violations; MKDKI; The verdict role.


Keywords


Medical Dispute; Physicians and Dentists; Disciplinary violations; MKDKI; The role of the Decision.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arifin, Dani Amalia. “Kajian Yuridis Tanggung Jawab Perdata Rumah Sakit Akibat Kelalaian dalam Pelayanan Kesehatan”. Jurnal Idea Hukum. Vol. 2 Number 1. March Edition 2016. Purwokerto: Magister Degree of Law, Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman;

Arthani, Ni Luh Gede Yogi dan Made Emy Andayani Citra. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pasien Selaku Konsumen Jasa Pelayanan Kesehatan yang Mengalami Malpraktek”. Jurnal Advokasi FH Unmas. Vol. 3 Number 2. Edition 2013. Denpasar: Faculty of Law Universitas Mahasaraswati;

Budi, Ananta Tantri “Upaya bantuan hukum dokter gigi dalam menghadapi sengketa medis”. Jurnal PDGI. Vol. 59 Number 1. January Edition 2010. Surabaya: Faculty of Dentistry Universitas Airlangga;

Heryanto, Bambang. “Malpraktik Dokter dalam Perspektif Hukum”. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum. Vol. 10 Number 2. Edition Mei 2010. Purwokerto: Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman;

Mufidi, Faiz dan Sri Pursetyowati. ”Penyelesaian Sengketa Medik di Rumah Sakit”. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Wacana Paramarta. Vol. 8 Number 1. Edition 2009. Bandung: Faculty of Law Universitas Langlangbuana;

Nuryanto, Arif. “Model Perlindungan Hukum Profesi Dokter”. Jurisprudence. Vol. 1 Number 1. Edition Juli 2012. Surakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta;

Panggabean, Henry P. “Penanganan Kasus Malpraktek yang Responsif dalam Sistem Peradilan Indonesia”. Law Review UPH. Vol. 13 Number 3. March Edition 2014. Tangerang: Universitas Pelita Harapan;

Rahardjo, Satjipto. 1980. Hukum dan Masyarakat. Bandung: Angkasa;

Redaksi detiknews, 20 April 2015, MK Putuskan Dokter Bisa Dipenjara Tanpa Rekomendasi MKDKI. Tersedia di website http://news.detik.com/berita/2892693/mk-putuskan-dokter-bisa-dipenjara-tanpa-rekomendasi-mkdki, diakses pada 20 November 2016.

Soekanto, Soerjo. 1983. Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers;

Soekanto, Soerjo. 1990. Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers;

Sukarjono, Bambang. “Liabilitas Hukum Pihak Rumah Sakit terhadap Pasien (Studi tentang Perlindungan Konsumen/Pasien dan Tanggung Jawab Pihak Rumah Sakit dalam Transaksi Terapeutik pada Rumah Sakit Islam Siti Aisyah Kota Madiun)”. Sosial. Vol. 10 Number 2. September Edition2009. Malang: STIE Malangkucecwara;

Sudrajat, Tedi.” Aspirasi Reformasi Hukum dan Penegakan Hukum Progresif Melalui Media Hakim Perdamaian Desa”. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum. Vol. 10 Number 3. September Edition 2010. Purwokerto: Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman;

Wahyudi, Setya. “Tanggung Jawab Rumah Sakit terhadap Kerugian Akibat Kelalaian Tenaga Kesehatan dan Implikasinya”. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum. Vol. 11 Number 3. September Edition 2011. Purwokerto: Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman;

Wantu, Fence M.” Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum. Keadilan dan Kemanfaatan dalam Putusan Hakim di Peradilan Perdata”. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum. Vol. 12 Number 3. September Edition 2012. Purwokerto: Faculty of Universitas Jenderal Soedirman.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2017.17.1.647

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.